On Political Change: Why Hope and Inertia are separate

Man with book, twitter meme. Cannot find who to cite. (https://x.com)

(NEW YORK METROPOLITAIN AREA) - Inertia, on politics, and on “Political Inertia” as defined in the New York Times. It is impossible for one person to look at a mirror or a reflection of oneself, and think that they are correct, or themselves. Imposter syndrome is a real thing. However, not every person who has been through imposter syndrome will be a good person, or a reflection of the real. Obviously, however, what might not be obvious- even to people who use social media heavily, and those who create on social media. 

-

Waiver of corporate personhood in relation to certain rights as defined below: 

This does not supersede pre-existing contractual obligations, nor does it supersede pre-existing contractual regulations as applicable. However, the “person” as this contract between The Radical Times, and its readers, is that the published works of this website are the property of all people. However, its writers hold the ultimate say over whether they may take down articles. However writers with access to articles are obligated to take down those articles. To see the difference in personal and political change, note the Anonymous Writers account. 

–

The concept of inertia

Inertia, is a concept in physics. It is also, as described by this New York Times article from 1966, been previously described as a concept in politics. Full disclosure: the writer, and in fact the publisher of this article is writing an article, however the rights to this article are also waived. 

Ethan Klein must lose his case against the people that he is suing. M, Klein as has been shared with the public, and as can be commented upon by the individual in their capacity as a non-licensed and non-attorney person. Can not win for the context of Stare Decisis within the Common Law and the judicial body of work in the United States of America. H3H3 Productions may have been the target of a spurious and wrong lawsuit before, however now the individual, and the group, as corporate and individual persons, are wrong. 

–

Conclusion

Which brings me back to the concept of political inertia. Change can only be brought upon the world when someone acts upon the world. The world, has changed after the election of Donald Trump, the election of Fmr., Vice President Biden, and the re-election of Mr. Trump. It also acts upon the self. Reflective and reflexive action, alongside the pseudo-intellectual reflection upon the self (yes, even for money).

The self does not exist within corporations, however, if the court that is reviewing the cases that Ethan Klein, and H3H3 productions review the precedent of Citizens United v. FEC (2010), there will be more fictitious and frivolous lawsuits against the people of America, those people in which America was founded.

Those that accented to pass it, and those which are governed. However, the governance of man is the inert study of law. And politics is not law. Inertia is the concept of not changing, and changing. The politics of hope is to say that you “are the government and here to help”. Apply that as you must, however, hope, is not the concept of inertia. Hope is a choice. Practice it. Practice the practice of change, and hope, and positivity. And maybe those atomic habits might matter again.

-

Jean-Michel, John Michael, Valat De Cordova

Signed and effective as of, July 3rd 2025, not superseding private Collective documents